 |
 |
Litigation is challenging. High-profile litigation is doubly challenging.
Wouldn't you love a sneak peak into these big trials so you could learn
from the trial team's mistakes? In this article, trial and technology consultant
Ted Brooks draws on his experience in several high-profile trials to share
the top five problems that can arise and steps you can take to prevent them
from negatively impacting your own cases. Ted doesn't think you can guess
which cases he's referring to — but even if you do, he'll never tell.
This article contains 1,130 words.
TechnoFeature: Top Five High-Profile Trial Blunders
and How to Avoid Them in Your Own Practice
By Ted Brooks tbrooks@litigationtech.com
(This article is a TechnoLawyer Exclusive.)
INTRODUCTION
While some of the tips listed below relate primarily to high-profile matters,
a few are also worthy of consideration in preparation for any trial. Some
may appear obvious — even to the point that you might doubt they could
ever actually occur. I can tell you that I have dealt with every issue I've
addressed below during my career as a Trial/Technology Consultant. Also,
I have experience in several high-profile cases to draw upon, both criminal
and civil. I will not, however, imply, indicate, or attempt to indicate
in any way which trial or trials from which each point stems.
So no matter how clever you are, any assumptions you might make as to
which one(s) they are related will be wrong — and even if you're
right, I'll deny it.
There, got that out of the way.
1. PLAN ON THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO FROM THE OUTSET —
DON'T JUST ASSUME IT WILL SETTLE
Okay, this tip probably seems obvious, and unlikely to actually happen in
real life, but let me say that it does not always work that way. If it did,
I would never have had several "opportunities" to work up a case
in a matter of only a few short days — something that should normally
take weeks to prepare. In fact, of all the items I will address in this
article, this one is the most common.
How does this happen? Well, I think we all try to be optimistic, saving
our client precious money whenever possible and practical. Although statistically
the majority of cases do indeed settle, all it takes is one little "glitch"
on the eve of trial, and you're screwed. One seemingly insignificant misunderstanding,
a decimal point in the wrong place, or if you've been following current
events, even a plea bargain the Court rejects.
How can you prevent this? Work toward settlement if that is the logical
choice, but never assume it's over until it's over. That stated, when
it comes to trial preparation, don't wait until the final settlement attempt
fails the week before the trial date to get everything in order. This
includes all of the demonstratives, trial evidence database, mock trials,
and everything else. Although "miracles" may sometimes happen
on short-notice, you should not hope to be one of the fortunate few. Rather,
prepare several weeks in advance — for larger matters, several months
may be preferable.
2. WORK WITH THE BEST AVAILABLE PEOPLE — DON'T TRY TO
SAVE A FEW BUCKS
It is interesting that some of the best (and highest billing) law firms
in the land would go bargain hunting when looking for trial preparation
and litigation support assistance. While in many cases it certainly does
make sense, it is probably not the best way to go in high-profile matters.
Assuming your client didn't contact you just because you were the cheapest
firm around, it might also be assumed that they would appreciate your efforts
in securing the best assistance available as well. When viewed in perspective,
costs of litigation support, trial preparation, and presentation will be
relatively small.
Relatively small? How much does it cost? While I can only offer a general
figure for trial preparation and support (as this is primarily what our
firm provides), I can say that a "typical" (read: no real such
thing as a "typical" trial) one-month trial might end up running
in the $70,000 and up neighborhood.
Other oft-neglected items include videotaping of depositions, demonstrative
graphics and animations, top expert witnesses, and mock trials or focus
groups. Again, it just doesn't make sense in the big picture to provide
the high-profile client anything less than the best you can find.
3. MAINTAIN CONTROL OF YOUR CLIENT — DON'T LET THEM
MAKE STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR YOU
I have witnessed more than one client's attempt to take control of what
needs to get done, who needs to do it, how witnesses should be handled,
and so on. Fortunately, I can also say that most of the attorneys I have
worked with have been able to straighten things out and remind the client
of their role in the matter.
This is sometimes simple, and sometimes not. It depends on the client(s)
and the way they handle the pressure and stress of trial. You should not
take the fact that your client has an opinion lightly, but you must also
remember that their opinion is probably not the most objective. It may
help to bring in a third party at times — someone to help you play
"good cop/bad cop." An "objective" opinion from someone
other than you can often be helpful in this type of situation.
4. MEDIA COVERAGE — DON'T ASSUME THEY WILL SEE OR REPORT
IT YOUR WAY
High-profile trials make for great TV coverage. Interestingly, I have actually
heard reports that truly made me wonder if they came from the same courtroom
I was in all day. On the other hand, I have heard and read reports that
accurately described the proceedings or the intended release of information.
Entire lengthy interviews may be reduced to only a few seconds, offering
only a few points of interest. These points of interest may or may not
be what you wish to communicate about your case.
If you are involved in high-profile matters, you may know reporters who
will work with you to generally attempt to tell the story as you see it.
Others may not. Media coverage may be beneficial, or it may be very dangerous.
At any rate, it is a risk to some degree — and don't forget that
your opponent may wish to have their story told as well.
5. ENJOY THE EXPOSURE, PREPARE FOR NEW BUSINESS — DON'T
CHANGE WHO YOU ARE
Assuming a favorable outcome, you and your entire trial team can benefit
greatly as a result of your involvement. This can lead to new business,
other high-profile matters, and referrals.
Although you may need to make some adjustments to handle an increased
flow of work, it is always best to remember your roots. The quality of
work and reputation that landed that case should never be compromised
or spread so thin as to have a negative impact on your existing or new
clients.
CONCLUSION
Regardless of whether you ever have the chance to work on a high-profile
matter (hey, there aren't enough for everyone to have them), you can apply
each of these tips in some fashion to nearly every case. Again, some might
say these are all "no-brainers," but let me remind you in closing
that I have experienced and based each one on actual litigation experience.
Finally, if you think that a particular point above relates to a specific
case you have in mind, you're wrong ...
Copyright 2007 Ted Brooks. All rights reserved.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ted Brooks is the President of Litigation-Tech
LLC , a trial technology consulting firm based in San Francisco. Ted
won the Law Technology News Award for Most Innovative Use of Technology
in a Trial, and is a frequent speaker and author.
You can contact Ted via e-mail <tbrooks@litigationtech.com>
or telephone (415-291-9900).
Respond to this Article | Back
to Top
Did you receive this newsletter
from a friend or colleague?
If so, join TechnoLawyer, and sign up for your own FREE subscription today
at: http://www.technolawyer.com/
|
|
|
